Internal and external PETTLEP imagery training effects on three-point shooting performance in adolescent basketball players
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/physcult.2026.0302Keywords:
PETTLEP imagery, mental imagery, basketball shooting, shooting accuracy, retention, self-confidenceAbstract
Background and Study Aim. Motor imagery is widely used to enhance sport performance. Internal and external PETTLEP imagery perspectives are commonly applied to improve the execution of sport-specific skills, including basketball shooting. Despite the use of these imagery approaches in athletic training, their relative effectiveness in enhancing three-point shooting performance remains a matter of practical interest. This study examined the effects of Internal PETTLEP Imagery Training and External PETTLEP Imagery Training on three-point shooting performance in adolescent basketball players.
Materials and Methods. Ninety male basketball players aged 15–18 years were randomly assigned to an Internal PETTLEP Imagery Group (n = 30), an External PETTLEP Imagery Group (n = 30), or an Active Control Group (n = 30). Participants completed a 12-week intervention with three supervised sessions per week. Three-point shooting performance was assessed at pre-test, post-test, and a two-week retention test.
Results. Both imagery groups improved from pre-test to post-test and maintained higher shooting scores at retention than the Active Control Group. Significant effects were observed for Time, F(2, 172) = 18.42, p < .001, η²p = .18; Group, F(2, 86) = 5.67, p = .005, η²p = .12; and the Group × Time interaction, F(4, 172) = 9.83, p < .001, η²p = .19. Imagery ability was associated with shooting performance (p = .009), and self-confidence moderated the relationship between intervention condition and shooting performance (β = 0.52, p = .015).
Conclusions. Internal and external PETTLEP imagery were associated with improvements in three-point shooting performance and retention in adolescent basketball players. Imagery ability and self-confidence should be considered when implementing imagery-based training interventions.
References
Petway AJ, Freitas TT, Calleja-González J, Medina Leal D, Alcaraz PE. Training load and match-play demands in basketball based on competition level: A systematic review. Balsalobre-Fernández C (ed.) PLOS ONE, 2020;15(3): e0229212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229212
Boddington BJ, Cripps AJ, Scanlan AT, Spiteri T. The validity and reliability of the Basketball Jump Shooting Accuracy Test. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2019;37(14): 1648–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1582138
Vencúrik T, Milanović Z, Lazić A, Li F, Matulaitis K, Rupčić T. Performance factors that negatively influence shooting efficiency in women’s basketball. Frontiers in Physiology, 2022;13: 1042718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1042718
Paravlic AH, Slimani M, Tod D, Marusic U, Milanovic Z, Pisot R. Effects and Dose–Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Populations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 2018;48(5): 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0874-8
Simonsmeier BA, Andronie M, Buecker S, Frank C. The effects of imagery interventions in sports: a meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2021;14(1): 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1780627
Holmes PS, Collins DJ. The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2001;13(1): 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339004
Williams SE, Cumming J, Ntoumanis N, Nordin-Bates SM, Ramsey R, Hall C. Further Validation and Development of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2012;34(5): 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.5.621
Kanthack TFD, Bigliassi M, Vieira LF, Altimari LR. Efeito agudo da imagética no desempenho de lances livres e percepção de autoeficácia em atletas [Acute effect of imagery on free throw performance and self-efficacy perception in athletes]. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 2013;16(1): 47–57. (In Portuguese ). https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2014v16n1p47
Morone G, Ghanbari Ghooshchy S, Pulcini C, Spangu E, Zoccolotti P, Martelli M, et al. Motor Imagery and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review on the PETTLEP Model. Applied Sciences, 2022;12(19): 9753. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199753
Schuster C, Hilfiker R, Amft O, Scheidhauer A, Andrews B, Butler J, et al. Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines. BMC Medicine, 2011;9(1): 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-75
Fadare AS, Langco LA, Canalija CVJ, Kabirun CA, Abelardo-Sabandija BJ. Athletes’ Confidence and Anxiety Management: A Review in Achieving Optimal Sport Performance. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 2022;5(4):311-318. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i4p133
Feltz DL. Self-Confidence and Sports Performance: Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1988;16: 423–458. https://doi.org/10.1249/00003677-198800160-00016
Yang L, Tian Y, Wang Y. Noisy condition and three-point shot performance in skilled basketball players: the limited effect of self-talk. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2024;5: 1304911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1304911
Schack T, Essig K, Frank C, Koester D. Mental representation and motor imagery training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00328
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009;41(4): 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 2013;310(20): 2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Cox RH, Martens MP, Russell WD. Measuring Anxiety in Athletics: The Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory–2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2003;25(4): 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.4.519
Wakefield CJ, Smith D, Hogard E, Ellis R, Parry C. Using PETTLEP imagery as a simulation technique in nursing: Research and guidelines. Nurse Education in Practice, 2020;43: 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102700
Lee SM, Horino H. Exploring the Incorporation of Imagery Based on PETTLEP. The Sport Psychologist, 2025;39(4): 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2023-0170
Ezumah C. Mental imagery and performance in athletes. Zenodo; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7325629
Zhang Z, Rittisom S, Kanchanataweekul T. Effect of Imagery Training on College Students’ Basketball Shooting Accuracy. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 2023;3(6): 413–424. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3686
Richlan F, Weiß M, Kastner P, Braid J. Virtual training, real effects: a narrative review on sports performance enhancement through interventions in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023;14: 1240790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240790
Shen YQ, Sim YK, Bae J, Bang IJ, Seo JP. Differences in the relationship among grit, self-regulation, competition preparation, and sport confidence across performance levels: a multi-group analysis. Scientific Reports, 2025;15(1): 31111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16448-w
Lee G, Ryu J, Kim T. Psychological skills training impacts autonomic nervous system responses to stress during sport-specific imagery: An exploratory study in junior elite shooters. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023;14: 1047472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1047472
Chu TL (Alan), Petrie TA. Assessing and Maximizing Collegiate Athletes’ Psychological Skills Under Constraints: A Preseason Brief Intervention Approach. The Sport Psychologist, 2021;35(2): 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2020-0119
Williams SE, Quinton ML, Veldhuijzen Van Zanten JJCS, Davies J, Möller C, Trotman GP, et al. Mastery Imagery Ability Is Associated With Positive Anxiety and Performance During Psychological Stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021;12: 568580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568580
Volgemute K, Vazne Z, Malinauskas R. The benefits of guided imagery on athletic performance: a mixed-methods approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025;16: 1500194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1500194
Guillot A, Rienzo FD, Frank C, Debarnot U, MacIntyre TE. From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2024;17(1): 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.2007539
Downloads
Received
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marina Lawrance, Parasuraman Thavasu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 30 / PDF downloads: 15


